Mechanical Properties Improvement of Peat Soils Stabilized by Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) based Geopolymer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21771/jrtppi.2025.v16.no2.p176-185Keywords:
Geopolymer, Unconfined Compression Strength, Palm Oil Fuel Ash, PeatAbstract
Peat soils are generally characterized by high water content, significant organic matter composition, and relatively low shear strength compared to mineral soils. These properties may lead to excessive settlement and reduced load-bearing capacity, which can affect the performance of foundations and embankments constructed on peat deposits. Extensive peatland areas can be found in Jambi, Indonesia and innovative stabilization methods are required to enhance their mechanical properties for sustainable land use. This study develops an alternative method of stabilization by using palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as a base material for geopolymerization. POFA, an industrial by-product, is abundant in Jambi and offers a sustainable alternative to highly polluting Portland cement. The research methodology involved the preparation of geopolymer-stabilized peat samples with 0%, 10%, 15%, and 20% to total dry weight of POFA addition, followed by Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests to assess the improvement in soil strength. The results indicate a positive trend with increasing compressive strength values as the geopolymer content increases to 15%. The average UCS results for the consecutive amount of POFA geopolymer addition are 15.10 kPa, 30.05 kPa, 37.90 kPa, and 9.71 kPa. In conclusion, using POFA-based geopolymer shows potential as an effective and sustainable solution for improving the strength characteristics of peat soils with a notable maximum amount of addition at 15%. This stabilization technique could provide a viable method for infrastructure development in peatland areas.
References
Amaludin, A. E., Asrah, H., & Mohamad, H. M. (2023). A Review of Advances in Peat Soil Stabilisation Technology: Exploring the Potential of Palm Oil Fuel Ash Geopolymer as a Soil Stabiliser Material. Civil Engineering Journal, 9(8), 2085–2104. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-08-017
Ambily, P. S., Ravisankar, K., Umarani, C., Dattatreya, J. K., & Iyer, N. R. (2014). Development of ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 66(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.13.00057
Anda, M., Ritung, S., Suryani, E., Sukarman, Hikmat, M., Yatno, E., … Husnain. (2021). Revisiting tropical peatlands in Indonesia: Semi-detailed mapping, extent and depth distribution assessment. Geoderma, 402, 115235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115235
Andriani, Novasari, H., & Putra, H. G. (2023). Improvement of subgrade on peat soil using laterite soil and cement. In AIP Conference Proceedings (p. 070021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0119156
Dwina, D. O., Abiyoga, N. P., & Nurdin, A. (2024). Palm Oil Fuel Ash Fineness in Modifying CBR Characteristics of Peat Soil. Bentang : Jurnal Teoritis Dan Terapan Bidang Rekayasa Sipil, 12(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.33558/bentang.v12i2.9598
Elangbam, T., & Kalita, A. (2024). Comparative Study of Different Stabilizers for Peat Soil Stabilization: A Review (pp. 377–391). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39663-2_31
Fu, C., Ye, H., Zhu, K., Fang, D., & Zhou, J. (2020). Alkali cation effects on chloride binding of alkali-activated fly ash and metakaolin geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites, 114, 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103721
Ghadir, P., & Ranjbar, N. (2018). Clayey soil stabilization using geopolymer and Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials, 188, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.207
Jwaida, Z., Dulaimi, A., Mashaan, N., & Othuman Mydin, M. A. (2023). Geopolymers: The Green Alternative to Traditional Materials for Engineering Applications. Infrastructures, 8(6), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8060098
Khanday, S. A., Hussain, M., & Das, A. K. (2021a). A Review on Chemical Stabilization of Peat. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39(8), 5429–5443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01857-1
Khanday, S. A., Hussain, M., & Das, A. K. (2021b). Rice Husk Ash–Based Geopolymer Stabilization of Indian Peat: Experimental Investigation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 33(12). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003982
Khanday, S. A., Hussain, M., & Das, A. K. (2023). Ground-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag-Based Geopolymer-Treated Fibrous Peat (pp. 409–418). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4055-2_32
Muroby, V., & Anwar Makarim, C. (2020). Design alternative on peat soil. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1007(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1007/1/012178
Pei, L., Yang, X., Gui, Y., Wang, Z. C., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Influence of Organic Matter Content and Ingredient on The Physical and Mechanical Properties of Peat Soils. Hydrogeology & Engineering
Geology, 49(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202106009
Wassie, T. A., Demir, G., & Köktan, U. (2023). Influence of Curing Time and Initial Moisture Content on Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Soft Soil. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6673716
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurza Purwa Abiyoga, Dila Oktarise Dwina, Oki Alfernando, Fiona Dehansa Putri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

