Selecting Indonesia’s Iron and Steel Industry Mitigation Pathways Based on AIM/End-use Assessment

Retno Gumilang Dewi; Megawati Zunita; Gissa Navira Sevie; Nirma Afrisanti Kifnasih; Novi Syaftika

doi:10.21771/jrtppi.2024.v15.no1.p21-32

Authors

Retno Gumilang Dewi Center Research and Energy Policy, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Megawati Zunita Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Gissa Navira Sevie Research Center for Industrial Process and Manufacturing Technology, Research Organization for Energy and Manufacture, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia
Nirma Afrisanti Kifnasih Research Center for Industrial Process and Manufacturing Technology, Research Organization for Energy and Manufacture, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia
Novi Syaftika Research Center for Industrial Process and Manufacturing Technology, Research Organization for Energy and Manufacture, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21771/jrtppi.2024.v15.no1.p21-32

Keywords:

Linear Programming, Steel Industry, AIM/End-use, Energy, IPPU

Abstract

The measurement of mitigation pathways is important for Indonesia’s iron and steel industry in terms of reducing GHG emissions. This study conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the economic impacts with associated emission reduction potential of different mitigation strategies by developing an Abatement Cost Curve (ACC) that selects the mitigation option based on the logic of the AIM/End-use model up to 2050. The model was established through the baseline scenario, and the following appropriate mitigation options: adjusting the production structure (CM1), increasing energy efficiency by promoting low carbon technology and non-blast furnace technology that is un-implemented early in modeling years in Indonesia will be included for future reference (CM2), and switching from fossil fuels to low emission fuels (CM3). Results show that the selected technology roadmap from the abatement cost curve below carbon tax 110 US$/tCO2e in 2050 could lead to the most optimal emission reduction of 19.8 MtCO2e, 50.2 MtCO2e, 54.84 MtCO2e with investment costs 93.55 million US$, 1086 million US$, and 1183 million US$ in the scenarios CM1, CM2, and CM3, respectively. The effectiveness of each mitigation action reveals that energy savings and emission reduction from energy will rely mostly on promoting low-carbon technologies. The most effective strategy to reduce emissions from IPPU is to adjust the production structure.

References

Chen, Wenying, et al. “A Bottom-up Analysis of China’s Iron and Steel Industrial Energy Consumption and CO2emissions.” Applied Energy, vol. 136, no. 2014, 2014, pp. 1174–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.002.

Chunark, Puttipong, and Bundit Limmeechokchai. “Energy Saving Potential and CO2Mitigation Assessment Using the Asia-Pacific Integrated Model/Enduse in Thailand Energy Sectors.” Energy Procedia, vol. 79, Elsevier B.V., 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.580.

Government of Indonesia. “Laporan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca Dan Monitoring, Pelaporan, Verifikasi.” Laporan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca (GRK) Dan Monitoring, Pelaporan, Verifikasi (MPV), 2021, pp. 1–143.

Government of Indonesia. “Indonesia Long-Term Strategy for Low Carbon and Climate Resilience 2050.” Minister of Environment and Forestry, 2021, p. 156,https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Indonesia_LTS LCCR_2021.pdf.

Gri, Paul W., and P. Hammond. Industrial Energy Use and Carbon Emissions Reduction in the Iron and Steel Sector : A UK Perspective. no. April, 2019, pp. 109–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.148.

Hasanbeigi, Ali, et al. “A Bottom-up Model to Estimate the Energy Efficiency Improvement and CO2 Emission Reduction Potentials in the Chinese Iron and Steel Industry.” Energy, vol. 50, no. 1, 2013, pp. 315–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.062.

He, Kun, and Li Wang. “A Review of Energy Use and Energy-e Ffi Cient Technologies for the Iron and Steel Industry.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 70, no. June 2015, 2017, pp. 1022–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.007.

Jung, Tae Yong, et al. 8 . Application of AIM / Enduse Model to Korea.

Kainuma, Mikiko, et al. “Application of AIM/Enduse Model to Japan.” Climate Policy Assessment, 2003, pp. 155–76, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53985-8_10.

Li, Yuan, and Lei Zhu. “Cost of Energy Saving and CO2emissions Reduction in China’s Iron and Steel Sector.” Applied Energy, vol. 130, 2014, pp. 603–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.014.

BPPT. "Perencanaan Efisiensi dan Elastisitas Energi", 2013. pp. 1–82.

Lu, Biao, et al. “An Energy Intensity Optimization Model for Production System in Iron and Steel Industry.” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 100, 2016, pp. 285–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.064.

Ma, Ding, et al. “Quantifying the Co-Benefits of Decarbonisation in China’s Steel Sector: An Integrated Assessment Approach.” Applied Energy, vol. 162, 2016, pp. 1225–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.005.

Ma, Shuhua, et al. “Scenario Analysis of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Reduction Potential in China’s Iron and Steel Industry.” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 16, no. 4, 2012, pp. 506–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00418.x.

Mallett, Alexandra, and Prosanto Pal. “Green Transformation in the Iron and Steel Industry in India: Rethinking Patterns of Innovation.” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 44, no. September, 2022, p. 100968, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100968.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resource (MEMR) "Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia". 2016, pp. 1–23.

Ramakrishnan, A. Murali. "A study of Energy Efficiency in the Indian Iron and Steel Industry", 2013. https://shaktifoundation.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/A_Study_of_Energy_Efficiency_in_the_Indian_IS.pdf

Shrestha, Ram M., and Le Thanh Tung. 9 . Application of AIM / Enduse to Vietnam : A Study on Effects of CO 2 Emission Reduction Targets. no. 2.

Sodsai, Promtida, and Pichaya Rachdawong. “The Current Situation on CO 2 Emissions from the Steel Industry in Thailand and Mitigation Options.” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 6, 2012, pp. 48–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.018.

Widowati, Lusy, et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Profile Content. 2018, pp. 1–193.

William R. Morrow, et al. “Assessment of Energy Ef Fi Ciency Improvement and CO 2 Emission Reduction Potentials in India ’ s Cement and Iron & Steel Industries.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 65, 2014, pp. 131–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.022.

Yin, Xiang, and Wenying Chen. “Trends and Development of Steel Demand in China: A Bottom-up Analysis.” Resources Policy, vol. 38, no. 4, 2013, pp. 407–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.06.007.

Zhang, Qi, Yu Li, et al. Carbon Element Fl Ow Analysis and CO 2 Emission Reduction in Iron and Steel Works. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.211.

Zhang, Qi, Xiaoyu Zhao, et al. “Waste Energy Recovery and Energy Efficiency Improvement in China’s Iron and Steel Industry.” Applied Energy, vol. 191, 2017, pp. 502–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.072.

Zhang, Shaohui, et al. “Integrated Assessment of Resource-Energy-Environment Nexus in China ’ s Iron and Steel Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 232, 2019, pp. 235–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.392.