Impact of Reduced Activator Concentration and Curing Method on Compressive Strength of Metakaolin/Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Mortar

Authors

  • Andrie Harmaji Institut Teknologi Sains Bandung
  • Alexander Syahlendra Haimir
  • Bambang Sunendar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21771/jrtppi.2023.v14.no1.p19-28

Keywords:

geopolymer, fly ash, metakaolin, alkali activator, sodium carbonate

Abstract

The demand for cement is increasing each year, but the manufacture of 1 tonne of cement produces an equal number of carbondioxide (CO2) gas which is directly related to the increase in global warming. Therefore, we need a substitute material, namely geopolymer. This material has relatively superior properties compared to cement. However, one of the drawbacks of geopolymers is that the production costs are relatively more expensive compared to the manufacture of pre-cast cement because it requires chemical solutions such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) to activate the precursor. This research was conducted to replace a specific ratio of alkali activator with water to reduce the use of alkaline hydroxide solutions and sodium silicate while reducing production costs. The experiment was carried out by replacing the activator solution with water at a certain amount with a different curing method. Mechanical properties, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy characterization were used to analyze the effect of additional water in geopolymer. The compressive test result shows that the maximum water content that can replace the activator solution is 20% by activator mass for fly ash-based geopolymers and 30% by activator mass for metakaolin-based geopolymers, with sealed and bare curing conditions before the compressive strength was decreased sharply. Substitution of 10% water in fly ash-based geopolymer increases the compressive strength to 17.20 MPa. Compressive test results and characterization showed that the optimal curing condition for fly ash-based geopolymer was sealed curing and bare curing for metakaolin-based geopolymer. The strength increase is due to O-C-O bonds representing sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), which affects the compressive strength of fly ash-based and metakaolin-based geopolymers.

References

Aliabdo, A. A., Abd Elmoaty, A. E. M., & Salem, H. A. (2016). Effect of water addition, plasticizer and alkaline solution constitution on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance. Construction and Building Materials, 121, 694–703.

Alterary SS, Marei, NH. Fly ash properties, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of King Saud University – Science 2021; 33(6), p. 101536.

Amran, M, Al-Fakih, A, Chu, SH, Fediuk, R, Haruna, S, Azevedo, A, Vatin, N. Long-term durability properties of geopolymer concrete: An in-depth review. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2021;15, e00661.

Belaid F. How does concrete and cement industry transformation contribute to mitigating climate change challenges?. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances. 2022;15, 200084.

Castillo H, Collado H, Droguett T, Sánchez S, Vesely M, Garrido P, Palma S. Factors Affecting the Compressive Strength of Geopolymers: A Review. Minerals. 2021; 11(12):1317

Castillo, H, Collado, H, Droguett, T, Vesely, M, Garrido, P and Palma, S. State of the art of geopolymers: A review. e-Polymers 2022;22(1), pp. 108-124.

de Oliveira, L. B., de Azevedo, A. R. G., Marvila, M. T., Pereira, E. C., Fediuk, R., & Vieira, C. M. F. Durability of geopolymers with industrial waste. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2022;16, e00839.

Fayomi GU, et al. Perspectives on environmental CO2 emission and energy factor in Cement Industry IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019;331 012035.

Harmaji, A.. Seawater as Alkali Activator in Fly Ash Based Geopolymer. Engineering, MAthematics and Computer Science (EMACS) Journal 2022; 4(2), 45–49.

Jindal, B.B., Alomayri, T., Hasan, A. et al. Geopolymer concrete with metakaolin for sustainability: a comprehensive review on raw material’s properties, synthesis, performance, and potential application. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2022.

Kaze CR, Tchakouté HK, Mbakop TT, Mache JR, Kamseu E, Melo UC, Leonelli C, Rahier H. Synthesis and properties of inorganic polymers (geopolymers) derived from Cameroon-meta-halloysite. Ceram. Int. 2018;44, pp. 18499-18508.

Klima, KM, Schollbach, K, Brouwers, HJH, & Yu, Q. Thermal and fire resistance of Class F fly ash based geopolymers – A review. In Construction and Building Materials 2022;323, p. 126529.

Luukkonen, T, Tolonen, ET, Runtti, H et al. Optimization of the metakaolin geopolymer preparation for maximized ammonium adsorption capacity. J Mater Sci 2017;52, 9363–9376.

Monteiro PJ, Miller SA, Horvath A. Towards sustainable concrete. Nat. Mater. 2017;16 (7), pp. 698-699.

Morla P, Gupta R, Azarsa P, Sharma A. Corrosion Evaluation of Geopolymer Concrete Made with Fly Ash and Bottom Ash. Sustainability. 2021; 13(1):398.

Rajini, B, Rao, AVN, Sashidhar, C. COST ANALYSIS OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE OVER CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) 2020; 11(2), pp. 23-30.

Sanjuán MÁ, Andrade C, Mora P, Zaragoza A. Carbon Dioxide Uptake by Cement-Based Materials: A Spanish Case Study. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(1):339.

Shcherban’ EM, Stel’makh SA, Beskopylny A, Mailyan LR, Meskhi B. Increasing the Corrosion Resistance and Durability of Geopolymer Concrete Structures of Agricultural Buildings Operating in Specific Conditions of Aggressive Environments of Livestock Buildings. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(3):1655.

Sun, Q, Peng, Y, Georgolamprou, X, Li, D, Kiebach, R. Synthesis and characterization of a geopolymer/hexagonal‑boron nitride composite for free forming 3D extrusion-based printing. Applied Clay Science 2020;199, 105870

Verma M, Dev N, Rahman I, Nigam M, Ahmed M, Mallick J. Geopolymer Concrete: A Material for Sustainable Development in Indian Construction Industries. Crystals. 2022; 12(4):514.

Vilakazi AQ, Ndlovu S, Chipise L, Shemi A. The Recycling of Coal Fly Ash: A Review on Sustainable Developments and Economic Considerations. Sustainability. 2022; 14(4):1958.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-02

How to Cite

Harmaji, A., Haimir, A. S., & Sunendar, B. (2023). Impact of Reduced Activator Concentration and Curing Method on Compressive Strength of Metakaolin/Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Mortar. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Pencegahan Pencemaran Industri, 14(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.21771/jrtppi.2023.v14.no1.p19-28

Issue

Section

Articles